Federal Liberals Endorse Legal Pot

By: Joan Bryden , The Canadian Press
Date: Monday Jan. 16, 2012 8:20 AM PT

Federal Liberals are taking some risky departures from the cautious political norm in a bid to put their once-mighty party back on the electoral map.

They overwhelmingly approved Sunday a resolution calling for the legalization and regulation of marijuana — a position immediately endorsed in principle by interim leader Bob Rae, although it remains to be seen how, or if, the resolution translates into a platform plank for the next election.

“Let’s face up to it, Canada, the war on drugs has been a complete bust,” Rae declared in a closing speech to a three-day Liberal renewal convention.

Until now, Liberals have called only for decriminalization of marijuana, as has the NDP. The new call to legalize it completely and regulate its production and sale, much as is done with alcohol, is in stark contrast to the governing Conservatives, who’ve included stiffer penalties for marijuana possession in their omnibus tough-on-crime bill.

The legalized pot resolution came on the heels of another potentially risky gamble for the Liberals. After a heated debate late Saturday, delegates agreed to invite all liberal-minded Canadians to take part in choosing the party’s next leader.

The party will create a new class of Liberal “supporters” — anyone willing to register as believers in core Liberal values — who will not have to pay a fee for a membership card to participate in leadership contests.

Wrapping up the convention, Rae heralded the two moves as a sign the chastened Liberal party is reaching out and renewing itself after last May’s humiliating rout, when the party was reduced to a third-party rump with only 34 seats.

“We Liberals have clearly and emphatically said to the people of Canada: ‘We embrace change and we embrace all Canadians as we rebuild this great national party.”‘

Delegates further embraced change by choosing Mike Crawley as their new party president. He beat out Sheila Copps, a veteran former cabinet minister — whom some Liberals felt symbolized the past — by a slim 26 votes.

Rae maintained the convention underscores the difference between the Liberals and the more ideologically driven Tories and NDP, whom he described as dogmatic adherents to rigid “orthodoxies.”

“If you want to be part of a group of free-thinking, innovative, thoughtful, pragmatic, hopeful, positive, happy people, come and join the Liberal party,” he exhorted, adding with a chuckle, “And after the resolution on marijuana today, it’s going to be a group of even happier people in the Liberal party.”

Rae told delegates it makes no sense “to send another generation of young people into prison” for marijuana offences when “the most addictive substances that are facing Canada today are alcohol and cigarettes.”

While they were willing to take some risks, delegates balked at a resolution calling on Canada to consider cutting its ties to the monarchy, an idea that would open a constitutional can of worms.

Both the marijuana and monarchy resolutions were put forward by the party’s youth wing, which argued that the Liberal party needs to advance bold ideas that are more reflective of young people if it is to revive.

“I think that there’s a certain amount of generational change happening in the party,” said Samuel Lavoie, president of the Liberal youth wing.

“We’re willing to push the envelope and we have the numbers and we have the will power to flex our muscles when it’s needed.”

Lavoie acknowledged the Tories will doubtless pounce on the marijuana resolution to lambaste the Liberals as soft on drug crimes.

“I personally think we Liberals should stop worrying about what the Conservatives will think about our policy and approach,” he said, noting that diehard Tories will never vote Liberal in any event.

“We’re talking to Canadians. The fact is that this is a sensible policy, evidence-based policy that is very easy to defend … There is cross-partisan support among non-Conservative voters for this so we feel this is something that will get us votes.”

The marijuana resolution is not binding on the leader or the party. And delegates specifically rejected a proposal to remove the leader’s veto over the contents of future election platforms, so there’s no guarantee the party will ever actually campaign on the idea of legalizing pot.

Rae later said the resolution “reflects very much the spirit of the convention” and “it’s now up to us to take that resolution and see exactly what it will mean in terms of policy, because there are some practical questions we have to look at.”

With an overwhelming 77 per cent of delegates voting for legalization, Lavoie predicted: “I think it is really difficult for anyone to just ignore the result and the will of the membership.”

Under Jean Chretien’s government, the Liberals introduced legislation to make possession of small amounts of marijuana a ticketing, rather than criminal, offence. The bill was not pursued when Paul Martin took over the helm of the party and the Harper government has since dropped the idea entirely, moving in the opposite direction.

Martin Cauchon, the justice minister who introduced decriminalization, said Sunday he believes legalization is inevitable but that Canadians would be more comfortable with decriminalizing pot as a first step.

Delegates also supported reforming the country’s electoral system, agreeing to promote the idea of preferential balloting in federal elections, rather than the current first-past-the-post system. Preferential ballots, in which voters rank candidates, would ensure that only those who receive more than 50 per cent of the vote in their ridings would be elected to the House of Commons.

If no one received over half of the votes right off the bat, the last place candidate in a riding would be eliminated, with his or her supporters’ second choices then being tallied. The process would continue until one candidate emerged with more than 50 per cent.

They also endorsed a non-binding directive that all Liberal nomination contests be open, other than specified exceptions recommended by the leader and approved by the party’s national executive. Currently, the leader has the unfettered power to appoint an unlimited number of candidates and to protect incumbents from nomination challenges.

Delegates balked, however, at adopting a U.S.-style primary system to elect future leaders. They rejected a proposal to introduce a system of staggered regional leadership votes.

Despite some evidence of lingering internal feuds, with the Copps-Crawley presidential fight seen by many as a proxy for the old Chretien-Martin wars, the mood of the convention was primarily optimistic and forward-looking. About 3,200 registered to attend, the largest turnout for a non-leadership Liberal convention since 1978.

Many delegates said they were longtime Liberal supporters who had never bothered to become active in the party until last May’s election rout put its very survival in question.

“For those who thought it’s too early after May, that Liberals would be sitting at home, still in the fetal position, crying … look at this weekend,” crowed Crawley.

Both he and Copps immediately took pains to put the presidential contest behind them. Rae said he looks forward to working with Copps and the other two presidential contenders in the rebuilding effort.

Speculation about Rae’s future was a constant buzz in the background of the convention. When he took the post of interim leader last May, the party’s national executive demanded — and Rae promised — not to seek the post permanently. However, the executive, with eight new members elected at the convention, could choose to remove the ban on Rae running for permanent leader and Rae has steadfastly refused to say whether he’d take the plunge.

At a joint news conference Sunday with Rae, Crawley said the 33-member executive will make decisions about leadership rules “over the next few months.” He reiterated his view that the interim leader would have to step aside if a decision was made to run in the leadership contest slated for the spring of 2013.

“I accept completely what Michael just said,” Rae added.

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Comments Off

Avaaz polls to stop “Ominbus” bill

(Message from Avaaz)

Dear friends across Canada, In days, Harper will try to push through a crime law that could drastically raise our taxes and dole out harsher punishments for pot smokers than pedophiles — but Quebec and Ontario have refused to pay for the bad law. Together, we can stand with them and call on every province to ditch the crime bill and protect Canadians from useless expenses. Crime rates in Canada have been falling steadily for over a decade yet Harper insists on spending our money to lock up our most vulnerable citizens like youth and aboriginals. Spending billions on bad crime laws means that our taxes will rise or valuable social programs like Employment Insurance will be cut. Quebec and Ontario have already said they won’t pay and now we can sign this petition telling our Premiers to join them in protecting us from this bill. Texas blew billions on a crime fighting system that didn’t work and now Harper wants to do the same in Canada — but we can still stop him. Let’s ditch the crime bill by signing this petition calling on our Premiers to stand with Quebec, Ontario and Canadian taxpayers.

Click below to be heard and forward to everyone: http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_harpers_cruel_crime_billThe total crime rate for serious offences fell by 19% between 2000 and 2010. The crime severity rate has fallen 6% since 1998, which means that Canadians commit fewer violent crimes like murders, attempted murders and serious assaults. There are also fewer brake-ins, car thefts, robberies and drunk driving charges — still Harper wants to spend massive amounts of our money locking up more Canadians. Creating mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana smokers and putting kids who make mistakes behind bars is not the way to make Canada a better place. Join the call to show Harper that we’d rather invest in social programs that really help Canadians. Virtually all major authorities have questioned this approach to stopping crime: Texas, Ontario and Quebec, the Canadian Bar Association, Academics, think tanks, even a Conservative Senator. We’ve seen this approach fail in multiple US states but Harper remains dead-set on wasting our money on a law that will create more criminals. By signing this petition we can, together, tell Harper that we don’t want a tax hike for a bad law.

Click here to call on our Premiers to ditch the crime bill: http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_harpers_cruel_crime_billLet’s make our voices heard and ensure our government doesn’t waste our money on laws that we don’t need and that don’t work. With hope, Emma, Ari, Ricken, Laryn and the rest of the Avaaz team Sources

Texas conservatives reject Harper’s crime planhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/10/17/pol-vp-milewski-texas-crime.html Quebec balks at Ottawa’s law-and-order agenda http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/quebec-refuses-to-pay-costs-of-federal-crime-bill/article2221192/

Quebec will refuse to pay for omnibus crime billhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/11/01/pol-omnibus-crime-bill.htmlThe true costs of ‘truth in sentencing’ http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/the-true-costs-of-truth-in-sentencing/article1621898/

Crime bill penalizes logic http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/opinion/article/1450689>http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/opinion/article/1450689Kevin

Libin: Provinces will pay dearly for Tory crime bill http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/11/04/kevin-libin-provinces-will-pay-dearly-for-tory-crime-bill/

NDP blasts dismal response rate as Tories cut EI call centres http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-blasts-dismal-response-rate-as-tories-cut-ei-call-centres/article2214647/

Crime bill unfairly targets women, aboriginals, critics say http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/crime-bill-unfairly-targets-women-aboriginals-critics-say-132223703.html

“Bill C-10 will guarantee that aboriginal women remain in prison for longer”http://www.firstperspective.ca/news/3254-bill-c-10-will-guarantee-that-aboriginal-women-remain-in-prison-for-longerq.htmlPolice-reported crime statistics http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110721/dq110721b-eng.htmFact

Sheet for Police-Reported Crime Statistics In Canadahttp://www.justice.gov.sk.ca/Crime-Stats-FACTSHEET2010.pdfAvaaz.org is a 10-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks to Avaaz for their many good polls, please vote in their pol to prevent the coming tragedy and tell the Conservatives we don’t need more prisons.

Daniel Boughen

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Comments Off

Bill C-10

Heresis a brief on bill C-10.

Bill C-10 MMAR brief to represent patients that use cannabis.
What is Bill C-10
Bill C-10 is a set of laws the Canadian government is currently debating that will change the drug laws in Canada.

What is a brief?
A brief is an opinion of a person or groups of people on how the laws will effect them. Its purpose is to inform politicians on how the law may be good or bad.

Bill C-10 a breif by patients who use cannabis for medicine

Patients in Canada who use cannabis (marihuana).

This brief is regarding bill C-10 and how it will effect patients.

It will further affect (criminalize) those who come to their aid (Good Samaritans) with mandatory minimums. It will further affect (criminalize) a patient for their method of preparation of cannabis and the patient community who share cannabis and it’s preparations with one another for compassionate reasons.

A review of the proposed amendments and how they affect patients.

Proposed amendment Bill C-10
Clause 41: (1) Relevant portion of subsection 7(2):
(2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1)
(a) where the subject-matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I or II, other than cannabis (marijuana), is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life;
(b) where the subject-matter of the offence is cannabis (marijuana), is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years;

Affect of Proposed amendment Bill C-10

#1. Cannabis (marihuana) vs Cannabis

Patients who use medical cannabis are approved under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations for Schedule II sub paragraph (2) Cannabis (marihuana). Yet a LARGE majority of the patients that this group represents make preparations (edibles, tinctures, etc) and use Cannabis resin. These preparations are also shared among patients, often for compassionate reasons. Patients also support compassion clubs and good Samaritans. All these activities are currently illegal but it is the lack of respect for bad laws and a badly run program that promotes patients actions.

Schedule II from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
Cannabis, its preparations, derivatives and similar synthetic preparations, including
(1) Cannabis resin
(2) Cannabis (marihuana)
(3) …

#2. Number of plants

“Health Canada’s examination of the current available information suggests most individuals use an average daily amount of 1 gram to 3 grams of dried marihuana for medical purposes, whether it is taken orally, or inhaled or a combination of both.” Health Canada

That means the average patient needs more then 5 plants to accommodate their right to access (indoors) as allowed under the current MMAR. In essence every patient that uses cannabis grows more then 5 plants.

#3. Section 3 proposed amendments

Section 7 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2):
(3) The following factors must be taken into account in applying paragraphs (2)(a) to (b):
(a) the person used real property that belongs to a third party in committing the offence;
(b) the production constituted a potential security, health or safety hazard to persons under the age of 18 years who were in the location where the offence was committed or in the immediate area;
(c) the production constituted a potential public safety hazard in a residential area; or

Affect of Proposed amendment Bill C-10 and proposed amendments to the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (lack of foresight)

Health Canada plans to phase out personal production licenses and designated production licenses. Patients are opposed to this portion of the proposed amendments and believe bill C-10 in combination with the Health Canada proposed amendments will meet extremely stiff opposition from patients who have valid reasons for growing and a long history of launching charter challenges. Let us look at some of these proposed reasons for amendments to the Medical Cannabis Program.

From Health Canada Website proposed amendments to the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations:

the potential for diversion of marihuana produced for medical purposes to the illicit market;
the risk of home invasion due to the presence of large quantities of dried marihuana or marihuana plants;
public safety risks, including electrical and fire hazards, stemming from the cultivation of marihuana in homes;
public health risks due to the presence of excess mould and poor air quality associated with the cultivation of marihuana plants in homes;

Patients and supporting patient groups believe the potential for diversion of marihuana produced for medical purposes to the illicit market can be handled by the current section 5 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act with the exception that it is known good Samaritans provide patients with cannabis and an amendment should be made to reflect that reality.

Patients and supporting patient groups believe believes that risk of home invasion is based on the value of cannabis (marihuana) and would rather see laws deter criminals from invading homes for valuable assets and to please not discriminate based on morals.

Public safety risks including electrical and fire hazards, stemming from the cultivation of marihuana in homes is the same as the public safety risk of any unsafe cultivation of any plant in the home.

Public health risks due to the presence of excess mould and poor air quality associated with the cultivation of marihuana plants in homes should also apply to any plant or any situation that causes excess mould.

It is Patients and supporting patient groups experience that patients see the above as an arbitrary and discriminate reason for patients to stop growing in their homes as those risks can be properly mitigated. There is prescribed in the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations an inspector that one would assume balances the needs of the individual and society. It is unknown in the patient community if an inspector has ever been employed by Health Canada to inspect a legal growers home.

If we put these two proposed amendments and the past experiences of the patients together it is apparent to patients and supporting patient groups that Bill C-10 is a means to strong arm patients into submitting. Patients and supporting patient groups will not submit to these proposals.

#4. Carrot or the stick (fabricating statistics)

Bill C-10
(5) If the offender successfully completes a program under subsection (4), the court is not required to impose the minimum punishment for the offence for which the person was convicted.

This is bad science and will attribute to false addiction statistics. It is recommended that any person entering such a program be exempt from any database of statistics as there is great risk that freedom (the carrot) will promote perjury to avoid minimum sentences (the stick).

It also bewilders the patients and supporting patient groups that government is proposing scrapping the gun registry because it does not believe in keeping track of otherwise law abiding citizens and yet does nothing to scrap the Marihaua Medial Access Program which is also a database of keeping track of otherwise law abiding citizens including such intimate details as their health information and their doctors name.

Conclusion

Because patients and supporting patient groups use cannabis, a controlled substance, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act affects us in a very meaningful way. The control of substances such as cannabis needs to have measures in place that reflect the canadian public. In the experience of the patients and supporting patient groups it is accepted that patients give other patients cannabis edibles, oils, etc. Canadians grow for the medical purpose of mitigating their own symptoms with or without a license to do so. Canadians come to the aid of patients by growing medical cannabis for the patient with or without a license. The common complaints of patients and lack of government action creates a lack of respect by the majority of members for the law in these areas. There is a long history of patients that successfully launch charter challenges which enforces the determination of patients as a group. The Marihuana Medical Access Program is in turmoil that is a fact (recent example Matt Mernagh Ontario supreme court case).

Patients and supporting patient groups is asking parliament take measures to make sure amendments abolish criminalization of these activities not make them more criminal. This bill will only increase incarceration for those who support personal freedoms and create court costs associated with continued charter challenges.

Patients and supporting patient groups will be more then happy to share their experiences with government if they are willing to open dialogue.

Patients and supporting patient groups would like to extend an invitation to any compassionate member of Parliament to become a legal designated grower for a patient or to provide legal consent to use property for the patient or their designated grower to grow their cannabis.

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Comments Off

No omnibus bill for us, merci

Congratulations go out to Quebec Premiers Jean-Marc Fournier and Dalton McGinty who Refuse to pay for the Federal governments new ‘Omnibus bill brought out by the Harper Conservatives.  Founier testified at the House of Commons justice and human rights committee, and said clearly that ” Bill C-10 will wind up causing more crime, not less, because it is an unbalanced piece of legislation that doesn’t focus enough on the rehabilitation of criminals, particularly young offenders.”  In an obviously well considered statement he said ”What we want is a sustainable protection of the public,” he said. “We wish to see a reinsertion of the youth in society so that society can benefit from it.”

Fournier told the committee that the Conservatives’ bill is more of a short-term solution to fighting crime and he repeatedly warned it will mean more repeat offenders in the court and corrections systems. “C-10 does not take into account the return of the young offender, of the individual into society,” he said. “What you’ve got is a Band-Aid solution here, you’re not curing anything,”

This kind of courage should set an example for all the provinces, and encourage them to listen to the advice of the judiciary in the state of Texas, where they told CBC reporters that Canada is headed in the wrong direction by imposing mandatory minimum sentencing, especially for non violent and drug war prisoners. There, they have realized it costs ten times as much to incarcerate as it does to rehabilitate offenders, and now are realizing lower rates of repeat offenders after incarceration.

Lets hope the leaders of the other provinces and territories are listening, and address the conservatives by just saying no to the incredibly oppressive Omnibus bill. Its just bad for Canada to criminalize so many of its citizens with the mere stroke of a pen, when simpler and less expensive options exist. Legalizing Cannabis could have a tremendous effect, for example if Cannabis users were no longer criminals,  I’m sure there would be more than enough room in there for crooked politicians and businessmen…    Just sayin’.

Daniel Boughen

For more, heres the CBC link to the article, theres also a very good discussion video.  http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/11/01/pol-omnibus-crime-bill.html

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Comments Off

Wrong Lighting and the Cannabis industry

Cannabis was born outdoors, and never heard of 18/6 lighting until 25 years ago!

There is a new wave of learning now occurring about Cannabis, as growers  begin to ask some of the right questions about growing conditions and the most effective way of achieving the best results from their medical grows. Unfortunately, good information on growing Cannabis has become hard to find,  since much of the current information on Cannabis has been warped by the misuse of a single factor of the process, that of lighting.

It seems obvious to me that the proper lighting cycle for Cannabis shouldn’t be any different from any other short-day flowering plant here on planet earth, where global lighting never passes sixteen hours of daylight for the day, and yet for thirty years so called ‘Gurus’ have said that Cannabis needs eighteen hours of light to stay in a vegetative state.

For cannabis to have an eighteen hour day and a six hour night, it would have to be created under unnatural planetary conditions.  A planetary body being roughly a sphere, can only be lit on one half of its surface, or 12 hours at a time by a single light source  such as our sun. To cover more surface area and create an 18/6 cycle would require TWO light sources.  I am absolutely going out of my mind trying to imagine the gravitational forces and planetary orbits for a model with twin stars. In fact 18 hour lighting is so unnatural, few other plants on earth could possibly survive it, since 18 hour lighting conditions do not exist anywhere, and does it not fit in with the planets natural ecosphere.  It is a testament to Cannabis’s toughness that it can stand so much abuse and still survive.

Authors who wrote that Cannabis should be grown under eighteen hours added lighting hours to their schedules hoping to boost crops for profit, and yet one has to wonder why the botanically experts of the times ignored them.  One may easily extrapolate that a prohibitionist social atmosphere would have frowned on botanical experts for proving or disproving anything written about Cannabis.  Still, their tacit support of a erroneous botanical principle allowed the creation of an entire industry on products that only a highly stressed, tired out and weakened plant requires. I have had great success using cheap and easy to get materials that you can find in your Kitchen.

Cannabis has been historically known as the easiest to grow, most abundant plant on earth, yet these books have made it more difficult to grow and more expensive as well as  indirectly blackmailing illegal growers who can’t possibly complain about  over-hyped and over-priced products. Further, while they somewhat recognize that Cannabis is a short-day plant,  they  incorrectly claim that twelve hours is sufficient to properly flower Cannabis. Back here on earth, a short day is when the hours drop below 11 hours and  nine hours in northern climates. Again, a mistaken hypothesis prevents the plants from fully blooming, and retards flowering because twelve hours light is neither short nor long, but intermediate length. These writers completely ignored over a century of research and work on photo-periodic lighting by botanical specialists such as Paul V Nelson (‘Greenhouse Management’ ) which discusses light interruption during night cycles to prevent short day plants from flowering.

In the spring of 2012 my first book  ‘Medical growing,  A Garden of Peace‘  will be released on Trineday Press,  and these schedules will be included for the first time in any book on growing Cannabis, aong with lots of easy and helpful tips on organic growing.  You can shift your plants to an all natural and stress free paradigm.

Cannabis is EASY to grow.  Don’t let the Gurus tell you different.

Daniel Boughen

 

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Comments Off

It’s tooth and nail in the US now.

Dan Boughen Oh-Cannabis Editor

Dan Boughen Oh-Cannabis Editor

Thanks to the volume of articles  in publications such as  Toke of the Town, Alternet News, rawstory.comspooftimes.comhuffingtonpost.com,  www.youtube.com  www.naturalnews.com, and the other dozens of online publications now publishing, the campaign against prohibition  is reaching a fever pitch. Each one posts articles daily on Facebook in dizzying speed, where there was once only a dribble of information, now there is a torrent of articles on the efficacy of Cannabis, and a growing demand for the end to prohibition.

If this is any indication of what is in store for the future, then it is definitely time Canadian politicians took notice and chose a new tack for national drug policy. While Cannabis is allowed for certain patients who are willing to pay fees and endure a flawed registration system may be allowed to use cannabis, it remains defacto illegal in spite of several Supreme court decisions.

In the US, lawmakers openly discuss legalization, while at the same time bickering with their agencies over proven science, and refuse to admit the war on the people has broken the nation. It may take a social revolution to solve, since the moneyed elite hold the power,  and the people are now destitute.  It is now seen to be a class war, the poor against the rich, the poor are very, very angry, and the rich are scared to death.  If the American economy crashes, and they are unable to pay social security and vets benefits,  the stage may be set for uprising.

Fortunately, corporations aren’t as deeply entrenched in Canadian government  (or am I being naive?) so the interests of the people of Canada are more closely monitored,  right? A stronger economy may not protect us from collapse from within, the corruption of the rotting American Administration proves that. Ending prohibition will end corruption, but they know that.  If they wanted to end corruption it would have been already done.

In either country,  Cannabis prohibition is a violation of human rights, its suppression a heinous crime against nature, and its enforcement is a vicious attack on the people.

I know Canadians want a better country, Americans too.  So why are our governments standing in the way? Why arrest peacemakers and patients? Why jail free citizens when the real crooks wear business suits and lobby in the halls of power?

Legalize cannabis, and end the corruption, the wave that began in the east is coming to our shores soon, and we WILL have our rights.

Dan Boughen

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Leave a comment

Message from L.E.A.P.

Dan Boughen Oh-Cannabis Editor

Dan Boughen Oh-Cannabis Editor

Message from L.E.A.P.: 40 Years Of Failed “War on Drugs” Is Enough

I received this in my email, wanted to pass it on, so everyone has a chance to send an email along to an intransigent president.  As a Canadian, I’m not eligible to vote, but my many American friends will, I am sure.

Peace, Dan Boughen

On June 17, 1971, President Richard Nixon declared a “war on drugs.” Forty years later, looking at the carnage drug prohibition has caused, it is safe to say that the policy has failed. President Barack Obama has expressed a willingness to look at drug policy from a public health perspective, and his drug czar claimed that he was ending the “war on drugs.”  Earlier this year, the president himself even told LEAP that he believes legalization to be “an entirely legitimate topic for debate.” Still, his policies have not reflected much of a real shift in priorities. Tell President Obama that actions speak louder than words and that a real – not just a rhetorical – end to the “war on drugs” is long overdue.

http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5663/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=7170

President Obama has expressed willingness to focus on drug policy from a public health perspective, and earlier this year, he told LEAP that legalization was “an entirely legitimate topic for debate,” but his policies have not reflected any real shift in priorities. Our cops will be marking the 40th anniversary of the “war on drugs” by taking their concerns directly to the drug czar’s office next week in an attempt to hand-deliver a brand new report we’ll be releasing that details the ongoing carnage of this war. We’ll send more information about the report next week, but for now please back up our law enforcers by taking a moment to send a letter to the president telling him 40 years of the “war on drugs” is enough! To email the president, visit:

http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5663/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=7170

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Leave a comment

Ex Pharma Gwen Olson Sales Rep speaks the truth – Pharma doesn’t want to cure you

Dan Boughen Oh-Cannabis Editor

Dan Boughen Oh-Cannabis Editor

Ex pharmaceutical Rep Gwen Olson speaks out about Big Pharma and reveals the shocking truth their real motivations and lack there of to cure , heal and care for you or your best interests.  Big Pharmacy doesn’t want to cure Cancer, only to cure the space in their pockets not yet filled with your cash.
Drug Companies  earn FIVE TIMES the amount of any other Fortune 500 companies by selling defective products which are simply addictive and destructive.

Listen to what Gwen has to say n this brutally frank expose of pharmaceutical Company policy.

 

Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canadians, Clubs, New Brunswick, Newfoundland/Labrador, Nova Scotia, Nunavit, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Top News Stories, Vancouver Island, World News, Yukon | Leave a comment